Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
Starring Herbert Marshall, Norah Baring and Phyllis Konstam
At a
boarding house for actors across from a theater, a body is found.
The only suspect in the crime is Diana Baring, sitting in the same room
with the body, claiming to have no memory of the deed.
The case quickly goes to trial and the
jurors decide she’s either guilty or schizophrenic and a danger to
others. In either case, she should be condemned.
However, one of the jurors has second
thoughts. Sir John is a famous actor who begins to believe in the
accused’s innocence and sets off to investigate with the help of a
stage manager and his wife.
Sir John visits the scene of the crime
and Diana's bedroom. He even visits her in prison. Will the trail
lead to the killer? And what will the killer do once caught?
It should be no secret around here that
100 Years loves his Hitchcock. Many of the suspense master’s films
are the reason I became interested in classic films in the first
place.
So it’s with no small amount of
disappointment that I report that Murder! is not a very good film.
At its core, we have a lot of the
staples of a Hitchcock film. It’s a procedural with an
unconventional character doing the detecting. It’s obsessed with
identity and appearances. A lot of the fun technical Hitchcock
touches are here as well. When his camera zooms or pans, it’s for
a purpose. When he focuses in tight on the killer’s face at the
end, it’s absolutely essential.
What the film lacks though is suspense
and a compelling lead character.
In any whodunit like this, you want to
build the tension and narrow the field of suspects. Well, Sir John
never really investigates many suspects. He just meanders around
town from scene to scene, assembling little clues. Nobody is overly
concerned about his investigation or trying to stop him. It’s
ponderous.
And Sir John himself turns out to be a
bit of bore. His shtick is to use his theater training to suss out
the mystery. So, for example, when the boarding house landlady
swears the high pitched voice she heard had to be a woman, Sir John
contrives to be in a separate room and talks in a female voice,
fooling the landlady and demonstrating perhaps she was wrong.
It would be an interesting way of
telling this tale if it were not so ham-handed. Sir John literally
walks out of the room in full view of the landlady and a second later
a voice that sounds like any guy impersonating a woman comes from the
other room. It’s not proof that the voices arguing in the
apartment; it’s proof that the landlady is a moron and that Sir
John would be terrible in Tootsie.
The film is not suspenseful, but that’s
not to say it doesn’t have moments of suspense. The climax of the
film where the killer is wrestling with his guilt and the aftermath
of that moment is nail-biting. We’re watching with bated breath to
see not whether he’s the killer (we know he is), but what he’s
going to do as the trap closes on him.
Still, after a promising opening, it’s
a slog of cliché and exposition to get to the end. Murder! is
necessary viewing for the Hitchcock completist, but that’s about as
far as I’d go.
** out of *****

I have yet to see and of Hitchcock's early films but know I will have to if I want to be a serious film critic although you saying that it doesn't have much suspense doesn't make me want to run out and see this. Great post btw
ReplyDeleteYeah, Murder! traffics in surprise more than suspense. I have really enjoyed most of his silents so far though so definitely check them out!
Delete